How do you use a k-seriesreducing machine with a 185 kw power machine to make a 50-turner output? Since thereducing ratio is based on one-by-one data based on parameters such as the modulus of the teeth calculated by the i technology, it could affect the thickness of the teeth or a safety factor, etc. , if the rate-reducing ratio is changed at will. the parameters that can be formed during the matching of these models with the power of the power plant are:Gearbox motorThe range is between 721 and 520. In the selection process, there are also users whose needs are not well-satisfied, as in the case of this user, whose outputs are subject to specified requirements, and who need to be changed in a number of ways to meet user needs. These are some relevant parameters. If the use requirements are not met, the technical staff should be contacted to see how they are handled, so that the corresponding changes to the equipment are still the corresponding non-standardization of thereducing machines, etc. The output rate of the power is reduced by fm, and then the output rate of the gear-reducing machine is reduced to 50. The output range is 28 to 203 per minute. If this method is used to select this group of output rotations as a 51-turn parameter, then the relevant type of thereducing machine is k107 or kf107, ka107, kaf107, and kaf107, which requires a fair method of output based on the actual equipment needs of the user. From the information, it can be seen that there is a closer output rate of 51 turns per minute. So is there a 50-turn output in this range? There's supposed to be a 50-turn output in the size of ezekiel. the k87, k97, k107, k127, k157, k167, k187, k157rf 107, k167, k167, k167, k167rf 107, k167rf 107, k187, k187 rf 107, k187, k187, all match 185 kwMotor gearedYeah。

If the 4-polar 185kw power is used, the parameters of the selected type of information can be directly referenced. let's see what model these 185kw electrics matchGeared motorI don't know. On some users, he was willing to look at the model parameters and then determine whiching machine was used in detail. In the use of some devices, there are often users who choose a straight-angle-reducing machine on the equipment without knowing what type they choose to use, so they tend to struggle with which type combination is preferable. The rate-cutting ratio has not changed so easily. How should this be handled? If it is only 50 minutes per minute, then the type of electric power is replaced by a modular. The electric power, on the other hand, will become 185KW's variant power to match, so the other parameters of thereducing machine at this time are the output torque 3490Nm,reducing ratio 29, and the axle-direction load is 444,400N. The choice ofcutting machines in this way, or of power-reducing opportunities, is more reactive. This time, we're using a selection of the K series hard-to-penetrate brakes for B0SERL. This method can be used when there is little difference. It's like a user who used it a little while agoMotor-gear reducerWhat type would be more appropriate in a situation where a machine matching 185KW would then form a 50-turn output? What should be noticed in the selection process? The user ' s demand is to use a gear-lined straight-angle reduction machine with a 185KW power, and to choose with the parameters of the 4 polar power without knowing how extreme it is. So this K107 is still more appropriate. http://boserlgearreducer.com/product/list-kxiliejiansuji-cn.html